Skip to main content

Crypto or Control?

Photo by Worldspectrum

Cryptocurrencies have promised a new world: one where financial freedom reigns, where individuals control their own wealth, free from the oversight of centralized governments and banks. But while Bitcoin and Ethereum have given us a glimpse into this vision, there’s a storm brewing behind the scenes: Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). These state-controlled digital currencies could transform the landscape of global finance, but not in the way you might expect. Could the very thing that we thought would empower people end up enslaving us in an even tighter grip?

The rise of CBDCs presents a controversial pivot from the decentralization that cryptocurrencies stand for. The same blockchain technology that underpins the world's most popular cryptos is being repurposed for government control. Rather than offering freedom, CBDCs could be the Trojan horse for a new era of financial surveillance, manipulation, and control. It’s time we ask the big question: Is crypto really going to liberate us—or is it just another step toward control?

What Are CBDCs?

At their core, Central Bank Digital Currencies are government-backed digital currencies, designed to serve as legal tender in the same way that physical cash does today. Unlike cryptocurrencies, which are decentralized and run on networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum, CBDCs are controlled and regulated by the central banks of individual countries.

The concept is not entirely new. Many countries, including China, the European Union, and the U.S., are already exploring or testing their own digital currencies. For example, China’s “Digital Yuan” has already entered pilot stages in several cities, while the European Central Bank is actively researching a potential “Digital Euro.” The U.S. has been slower to act, but talks about the "digital dollar" are growing louder each year. 

In theory, these currencies promise more efficient and cheaper transactions, more secure payment systems, and greater financial inclusion. But when we take a closer look, things start to get complicated.

The Surveillance State: Financial Big Brother

Here’s where it gets dicey. While cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin promise anonymity, decentralization, and privacy, CBDCs could become the ultimate tool of surveillance. Imagine every single transaction you make, from buying groceries to paying rent, being tracked, stored, and monitored by your country’s central bank. You thought your spending habits were private? Think again.

CBDCs don’t just enable governments to know what you’re buying—they can program them, too. Money could be restricted based on factors like your social credit score or political affiliations. For instance, if you’re deemed to be engaging in “unsavory” activities—like protesting the government or buying certain goods—your digital currency could be frozen or limited, leaving you unable to pay for basic necessities.

In 2022, the People's Bank of China ran tests on its digital yuan that included the ability to limit what people could spend their money on, based on their location and the merchant involved. This might sound like dystopian science fiction, but it’s happening right now.

The Bank of England has also considered using CBDCs for financial tracking purposes. In a 2020 paper, they proposed that digital currencies could be used to monitor transactions for illegal activity, which sounds good in theory—until you realize that this opens up the possibility of state-sponsored financial surveillance at a scale we’ve never seen before.

If governments can track every dollar spent, they can also make it difficult for people to protest or challenge power. In theory, CBDCs could become an economic form of censorship, where dissent is financially strangled, and political opposition is made impossible.

The Control Factor: Programmable Money

Let’s talk about the concept of “programmable money.” Sounds cool, right? Money that’s designed to do more than just sit in your wallet or bank account? But what happens when the rules around that money are set by someone else?

With CBDCs, governments could have the ability to dictate how money is used. For example, they could prevent you from spending your digital dollars on things they deem undesirable, like certain goods or services. The money could have an expiration date, forcing you to spend it by a certain date, or else it disappears into the void.

This level of control over people’s wealth opens up a dangerous path. If digital currencies are linked directly to your ID and social score, the government could prevent you from spending money at places they deem “unfit” or “subversive.” It’s easy to see how this could be used as a political tool to suppress certain groups or individuals.

Imagine the implications for business owners, freelancers, or activists. If your digital wallet is controlled by the state, and your freedom to earn or spend is subject to their whims, the idea of financial autonomy starts to look a lot more like financial oppression.

Crypto: The Anti-CBDC?

Enter the world of decentralized crypto, which, on the surface, seems like the antithesis to everything CBDCs stand for. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero were created specifically to avoid centralized control, enabling anyone with internet access to trade without a middleman. It’s about self-sovereignty and privacy.

Bitcoin, for example, operates on a decentralized blockchain, meaning no single entity or government can control it. Its core value is about freedom: the freedom to send, receive, and store value without interference from financial institutions or state apparatus. In this sense, Bitcoin isn’t just a digital asset—it’s a movement.

But here's where it gets complicated. While decentralized, unregulated crypto has empowered many, it has also opened doors for illicit activities. This is exactly why governments are keen on CBDCs—if they can’t control decentralized cryptos, they’ll create their own systems, luring people into their web with promises of stability, security, and ease of use. But once they have you, they can control every aspect of your financial life.

The Fine Line Between Freedom and Tyranny

The battle between decentralized crypto and CBDCs is more than just a financial debate—it’s a philosophical one. It’s about whether we want to live in a world where we control our money and make our own financial decisions, or whether we’ll allow governments to dictate how we spend, save, and even think.

The appeal of CBDCs is undeniable. Faster, cheaper, and more efficient payments could benefit people in emerging markets, and governments could better track and prevent illegal activity. But the flip side is far darker. When digital currency becomes a tool for control, when spending is no longer private and decisions are made by a central authority, we lose our financial autonomy—and with it, our freedom.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Domestic Violence Shelters Are Failing Victims

  Photo by MART PRODUCTION: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-in-gray-shirt-holding-brown-cardboard-8078358 / A Haven in Name Only: The False Promise of Safety When most people think of domestic violence shelters, they imagine a safe space where survivors are protected and supported. These places are meant to be havens—offering warmth, resources, and healing. But the truth is often much darker. Behind the comforting words and pictures on websites are institutions stretched thin by lack of funding, overworked staff, and outdated rules. For some survivors, walking into a shelter feels like entering a fortress of rules, suspicion, and silence. Imagine fleeing your home in the middle of the night with your child in your arms, only to be met with a long list of requirements: proof of abuse, sobriety, a willingness to follow strict daily schedules, even a background check. Suddenly, the place you hoped would help becomes another place you have to survive. The public doesn’t often see ...
Read more

Medical Kidnapping in the U.S.: When Hospitals Take Your Children

Photo by Saúl Sigüenza Imagine taking your child to the hospital for a routine check-up or a minor injury, only to find yourself accused of abuse and your child taken away by authorities. This harrowing scenario, often referred to as medical kidnapping , is a distressing reality for numerous families across the United States. Under allegations of "medical neglect" or disputed diagnoses, parents—particularly those who are poor, disabled, or from minority communities—find themselves entangled in a system where their rights are overshadowed by institutional decisions. What Is Medical Kidnapping? Definition and Context Medical kidnapping refers to situations where a child is taken from their parents or guardians by child protective services (CPS) due to disagreements over medical care. This often arises when medical professionals suspect that a parent is either neglecting necessary medical treatment or pursuing treatments deemed unconventional or unnecessary. Legal Gray Areas...
Read more

Exploitation in Foster Care: The Hidden Pipeline to Human Trafficking

Photo by Kindel Media from Pexels When we think of foster care, we picture safety—a temporary haven for children who need protection. But for far too many, that haven becomes a trap. Behind the scenes of well-meaning systems lies a dangerous reality: some children in foster care are being funneled straight into human trafficking, institutional abuse, and chronic homelessness. And worse? No one is truly keeping count. The Dark Underside of Foster Care In the U.S. alone, over 391,000 children were in foster care in 2022 ( Children’s Bureau ). Many enter the system due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment—but once inside, the promise of safety often dissolves. Certain states have become notorious for poor oversight, abusive group homes, and a shocking lack of accountability. In places like Florida, California, and Texas, reports have surfaced of foster kids going missing from group homes—some found later in trafficking rings. Others vanish into homelessness the day they “age out” at 18, left...
Read more